The Many Perspectives of “Innovation”

A recent article in a local South Carolina business publication illustrates the general lack of understanding of “innovation”, arguably the most over-used word in the business lexicon. And exemplifies the challenge many areas of the country have in diversifying away from a focus on branch manufacturing, where regions try to out-compete one another to have the next global company build a large manufacturing facility to spur economic development.

In the Upstate (western most part) of SC, that has been the focus and it has been wildly successful, as it has in other areas of the country. But is that a sustainable model to fuel economic development? The article’s title implies that the Upstate must rely more on “innovation” to fuel long-term growth. So what’s the problem with that, you ask?

Innovation, when discussed at all in the article, is only referenced in the first couple paragraphs and then it is a myopic view of the topic. There is mention of innovation in the transportation sector but there was no clear explanation of why it is important to a local economy to attract companies who will not just manufacture, but make decisions on what products to develop, engineer and develop them. And as a result will hire engineers and other highly compensated technical and managerial staff. On the other end of the spectrum, and for good measure, the article mentions entrepreneurship without ever discussing that topic.

The article seems to imply that embracing innovation in the Upstate means that shiny new company that will engineer and manufacture a radical new transportation system, maybe such as an autonomous car. No doubt that with the auto industry infrastructure and Clemson University International Center for Automotive Research (CU-ICAR) that is a desirable goal, but should that be the only focus? From my experience here, it seems like it is.

First, let’s step back and ask, what exactly is innovation? Is it only an exciting new breakthrough technology like an autonomous car? Is it only associated with that lone inventor in a garage slaving away for years to develop the next breakthrough product and change the world? That is the perception many have, and the article did nothing to dispel that notion.

Innovation is a process that mitigates between two dynamic factors: technology and market needs. Only when a technology and market need match up in time do you have innovation. Innovation is not technology for technology’s sake. That is an invention. Innovation implies that someone will actually pay for your product. In other words, it better meet a customer need. That can be an explicit need, like helping someone do a task faster or better than alternatives, or it might also satisfy an emotional need. Why do you think so many are willing to spend so much money on the latest Apple product? Just because of the technology?

So while talking about autonomous cars being built in the Upstate is sexy and makes great talking points for economic development organizations and politicians, it ignores the other ways that the economy can be diversified right now.  For instance, by attracting smaller to mid-sized manufacturing companies to set-up shop in the Upstate or help existing ones improve their ability to innovate. It may not be sexy, but it should be part of the equation.

One challenge the Upstate faces in promoting true product innovation is a result of the focus on branch manufacturing and “lean”. There seems to be a lean manufacturing consultant on every corner. Or a lean manufacturing class offered by multiple manufacturing-centric organizations and universities, all managed and run by those with manufacturing experience, not new product development or innovation management experience. Lean is sold as a way to “innovate”, but its focus is on efficiency, not the messy process of innovation. It is a manufacturing mindset obsessed with efficiency but is a recipe for disaster when it drives a company’s innovation processes.

For the vast majority of existing manufacturing companies, there are many things they can and should be doing to become more innovative. For instance, are they relying strictly on existing knowledge (e.g. existing products), or are they developing new knowledge that can generate new sources of revenue? How do they develop new knowledge? That might mean investing some resources in either new products (defined here as new to them but not new to the market) or possibly new-to-the world, radical products. That might require an acquisition, or hiring new skill sets. If definitely requires a culture that supports innovation and failure, and highly engaged management.

The reality, however, is that the vast majority of innovation opportunities are related to incremental innovation of existing products. There is nothing wrong with that. It is not sexy, but it pays the bills and helps grow the business. But there is a right way and a wrong way to accomplish incremental innovation. It cannot just be changing the color of the packaging.

In the innovation management world, the process that supports making decisions on the right mix of projects is called project portfolio management. It is akin to balancing risk in an investment portfolio. You don’t want to invest in all incremental development projects any more than placing all your bets on a risky new-to-the world product. Most companies have far more ideas and opportunities to develop new products than resources, so effective processes are a key component in making the best investment decisions.

There are many other opportunities for “innovation” that are ignored by most companies. For example, innovating the business model. The reality is that if you look around, much of what is termed “innovative” today has nothing to do with technology or even a fundamental market need, it is a new business model that is able to deliver value better than alternatives. Improving a company’s competitive strategy is another opportunity. For instance, finding ways to either develop products or business models where there is no competition, or how to compete more effectively by attacking competitive weaknesses rather than head-on with a me-too product.

Returning back to the article itself, after the cursory discussion on “innovation” at the beginning of the article, the bulk of the article rolls out the same old discussion of economic development topics associated with attracting branch manufacturing such as land available for building plants, the impact of tariffs, or development of a new technical high school. What does any of that have to do with using innovation to grow and diversify the economy?

There are many different ways to look at innovation and how it can help the Upstate or any other region faced with similar challenges. Those in the media, economic development organizations and politicians need to focus not just on the sexy aspects of innovation, but on all facets of how it can help grow the local economy.

New Product Visions helps companies improve their innovation management practices. We focus on processes, organization, management engagement and culture. Services include consulting, workshops, and MyInnovationCoach training. Jeff Groh spent 30+ years in industry with experience in sales and marketing, customer support, manufacturing and new product development.

What are the Key Issues in Managing Innovation for Small to Mid-Sized Organizations (SMEs)?

How will you continue to grow your business? Innovation and creating new products needs to be a key growth strategy for every business, but small to mid-sized organizations (SMEs) tend to develop new products on an inconsistent, ad-hoc basis, rather than employing a systematic process that produces a consistent stream of innovations.  Continue reading

Disrupting the Management Model and the Role of Distributed Decision Making

Cleaning out some boxes recently, I came across old photographs. It was not the photographs themselves from 1980 that caught my attention. It was the envelop they were in. For baby boomers like me, you’ll recall those ubiquitous yellow envelops. The memories of waiting patiently to get the film developed. Then hours spent filling albums. Continue reading

Process or Vision: What’s More Important for Product Innovation Success?

right-left-brainListen closely and you realize there is a lively debate between those who believe process is most important in innovation and others who contend that vision and creativity are what leads to success. The truth is that both are equally important and organizations interested in improving their ability to innovate must do both well.  Continue reading

The Dirty Little Secret: It’s Not About Your Product

BlindersManufacturing firms tend to focus on their products. In fact, we often fall in love with them. It consumes most of our time at work, and for many in the business, much of their time away from the office as well. We celebrate big orders and naively assume the good times will last forever. Elaborate marketing campaigns tout the benefits of our product vs. competitive offerings. We obsess on how to continually improve the product to out-do our competition. So what’s the problem, you ask?  Continue reading

Software Development Challenges for Traditionally Hardware Oriented Manufacturing Companies

softwareFor manufacturing companies software is an increasingly important aspect of their product’s value proposition. From consumer to industrial products, nearly every industry is affected. Incorporating software presents greater challenges to companies whose products have traditionally been hardware oriented. Continue reading

Small to Mid-Sized Manufacturing Firms: Unique Innovation Challenges

If you operate a small to mid-sized manufacturing enterprise (SME), how are you going to grow revenue and earnings? Every company relies on organic growth of their core products. For most that is typically not enough to sustain the business long term. Geographic expansion and acquisitions can help in some circumstances but long-term, a company must innovate or the business will stagnate and be eclipsed by competitive forces. This is especially true in today’s hyper-competitive environment (1).  Continue reading

A 5-Step Approach to Reduce Time-to-Market


Getting products to market faster is a common objective for every company. While the motivation varies, there are clear benefits including capturing more sales, beating competition to market, providing market flexibility and maintaining a leadership position. Reducing time-to-market can also be a focal point for improving the overall innovation management process (1).  Continue reading

Ignoring the Role of Innovation: A Disturbing Trend?

There are many paths to grow a company’s revenue and earnings. That topic typically consumes the majority of management bandwidth. Organic market growth, geographic expansion and acquisitions are all viable strategies. But are you ignoring the role of innovation? Surprisingly, a recent survey suggests many are.  Continue reading

Rethinking Your Company’s Purpose Benefits the Bottom Line

PointThe traditional management model has existed for more than a hundred years and the basic tenants are still fundamental to how businesses are managed. Concepts such as hierarchy, standardization, specialization, goal alignment and the use of extrinsic rewards to motivate behavior are key components. Above all, efficiency and financial performance are emphasized. If you ask most CEO’s, presidents or owners of companies what’s the “purpose” of their business, they might look at you with a confused expression, and simply say “we are in business to make a profit”. But is that really true? Are there other reasons for a business to exist and by rethinking your company’s purpose, can you achieve stronger and more sustainable financial success?  Continue reading